l0^'-e ;,vJ;l W& ^tJt^;-. -, «■:>,. vVrt-y--'.: ■'■ 'ijU^tataSiCiti ■'■■■ ■'■•-•<■ -i^*."' • ■y^::'ry,,^-^.i^- .',/:rt^>.-?'i '»■.," r ; ';: ■ ;.. *'.'.^.;-";''-.'.- ■ ■^:x.'>dii^- ' ' ' ' ■ ■: ' '^^i\.1^^"' A-:--ivS^^r5^> ■WM 3^1^i3-^>^'«V'l'^'.-' AS£^M {^_ THE FAUNA OF BRITISH INDIA, JT ^7 R O y INCLUDING CEYLON AND BURMA. Published under the autsoeitt of the Seceetary of State foe India in Council. edited by a. e. shipley, m.a., hon. d.sc, f.r.s. D E R M A P T E R A (EARWIGS). BY MALCOLM BURR, D.Sc, M.A., F.E.S., F.L.S., F LONDON: TAYLOR AND FRANCIS, RED LION COURT, FLEET STREET. CALCUTTA: I BOMBAY : THACKER, SPINK, & CO. | THACKER & CO., LIMITED. BERLIN : R. FRIEDLANDER & SOHN, U CARLSTRASSE. 1910. PRINTED BY TAYLOR ANT) FRANCIS, RED LIOM COURT, FLEET STREET, LONDON. CONTENTS. Page Editor's Preface v Author's Preface viij Systematic List of Species xiii Introduction ] General 1 Structure 2 Determination of Species 10 Development H Copulation 12 Oviposition 13 Ova 14 Habits 14 Food 17 Maternal Care 18 Geographical Distribution 19 Literature 26 Table of Families 31 ApachyidcB 31 Pygidicranidce 37 Labiduridce 67 Labiidcc HO Forjicididce 129 Species of Uncertain Position 204 Appendices : — A. On Collecting and Preserving Earwigs 207 B. List of Authors, and Abbreviations 208 C. Glossary 210 Index 213 Explanation of Plates. EDITOR'S PREFACE. In this the first of the 'Fauna of British India' Series issued under my Editorship, I would wish to record my sense of the loss Science has sustained through the death of the late Lieutenant-Colonel C. T. Bingham, He succeeded Dr. Blanford, who initiated and edited the Series for more than twenty years, in 1905, and since that time devoted himself unremittingly to the task he then took up. His loss has been widely felt, especially amongst the workers in systematic Entomology : if I may quote his own words about his predecessor : — " To few, however, will that loss be personally so great as to those who under his direction were working for the Fauna of India series/' During the year 1908 Colonel Bingham was engaged on his third and final volume on the Indian Butterflies. This, which was to have included the families Lycanidce and Hesperiidce, he left unfinished. I am happy to state that Mr. H. Druce has, with the sanction of the Secretary of State for India, undertaken to complete the work; but owing to the constantly increasing amount of material now available it will be necessary to devote a volume to each of these families. At the time of Lieutenant-Colonel Bingham's death, volumes on the following Groups had been sanctioned by VI EDITOR S PREFACE. the Secretary of State for publication : — on the Cicindelida, PaussidcE, and a General Introduction to the Coleoptera, by Canon W. W. Fowler : on the Orthoptera, by Mr. W. F. Kirby : on the Dermaptera, by Mr. Malcolm Burr : on the Butterflies (third and last volume), by Lieutenant-Colonel Bingham : on the Curculionidce, by Mr. G. A. K. Marshall : on the Cetoniidce and Dynastida, by Mr. G. Arrow : on the Ichneumonid(S, by Mr. Claude Morley : on Longicorn Beetles, by Mr. C. J. Gahan : and on the Bnprestidce, by Mr. E. P. Stebbing. Since that date, sanction has been obtained for an Appendix to the volumes on the Rhynchota, by Mr. W. L. Distant. In addition to the two (3rd and 4th) volumes on Butterflies already mentioned, the Secretary of State for India has also sanctioned a half volume on the Blattida, by Mr. R. Shelford ; and a whole volume, instead of the half volume previously sanctioned, on the Acridiidce and Locustida, by Mr. Kirby. Further, approval has been given for a second volume on the Mollusca, by Lieutenant-Colonel H. H. Godwin-Austen. Although there are few better known insects in Europe than the common Earwig, the Dermaptera are said to be rare in most parts of the world. The Order, however, in warm and tropical regions is rich in species. Hence, although but two species are probably indigenous to our islands, the number described by Dr. Burr from India amounts to over one hundred and thirty. In the present work Dr. Burr has adopted a new classifi- cation, and has incorporated in its pages the results of a series of systematic Papers which he has published during the last year or two. If we except some statements taken from de Bormans^ account of Earwigs from Burma, a very large proportion of this work is original. In the fifth volume of the ' Cambridge Natural History ' Dr. Sharp states: — "The classification of the earwigs is still in a rudimentary state " : I do not think I exaggerate when EDITOR S PREFACE. vii I say that Dr. Burr's work will cause the deletion of this senteuce if a new edition of Dr. Sharp's volume be called for. I cannot let this volume appear without expressing mv gratitude to Mr. G. A. K. Marshall for much time spent in proof-reading, and for much help in other Editorial tasks. A. E. SHIPLEY. October 1909. AUTHOR'S PREFACE. The Earwigs form a compact, homogeneous and well-defined group of insects. Owing to a superficial resemblance to certain Staphylinida, Linnaeus included them in the Coleo- ptera, but de Geer placed them in his Order Dermaptera, which corresponded to the Orthoptera of Olivier, in the modern acceptance of the name. Kirby, in 1815, treated them as a distinct Order, restricting to them de Geer's name Dermaptera, which had been superseded by Olivier's word for the larger group. Authors were then divided into two camps, those in favour of considering the earwigs as an Order and those who preferred to regard them as a Family of the Orthoptera. The actual name employed for the group of earwigs has varied still more. Erichson and Fischer called them Labi- duroidcB ; Latreille. Serville, and Scudder, Forficulidce ; Newman and Fischer von Waldheim, Forculina, followed at first by Burmeister, who later proposed Dermaptera in an amended form, Dermatoptera. Westwood invented the appropriate name Euplexoptera, and Fischer, Harmoptera ; Lrunner called them Forficularia, as a family of the Ortho- ptera ; Bolivar regards them as a section of the Orthoptera, under the name Dermaptera, with the single family Forfi- culidce. Dohrn, Redtenbacher, Krauss and Verhoeff follow Kirby, in giving them full ordinal rank, under de Geer's name Dermaptera; but de Bormans, in his monograph published in " Das Tierreich," treats them as a family, Forficulidce. Our own inclination is to treat them as a distinct order. AUTHOR S PREFACE. IX with the name Dermaptera, sanctioned by much use^ rejecting the corrections suggested, such as Dermoptera by Agassiz and Dermatoptera by Burmeister. No attempt had been made to subdivide earwigs into smaller gi-oups until this was done by Verhoeff (1902), who based his classification upon the genitalia. His system has the double disadvantage of being impracticable for ordinary purposes, and incomplete. Many of his characters are of doubtful value, and some of his Avork will probably never be accepted, while it is not free from inaccuracy, involved synonymy, and other drawbacks. It was, however, the first attempt to reject the empirical arrangement, with which de Bormans, for want of material, had been obliged to be content. As such it merits recognition and approbation. The writer of this work has endeavoured to pick out those portions of Verhoeff's Avork which appear to him to be souna, to retain the best part of de Bormans' system, to add a considerable amount of new material and original observa- tion and to produce a harmonious whole. The result of this attempt is set forth in the following pages. Families and subfamilies were first established by Verhoeff, but his definitions are not always retained, and his separation of the Apachjidxe into a suborder under the name Para- dermaptera is rejected. Only five families are retained, each divided into a varying number of subfamilies. A careful study of the characterisation of these groups is essential to the understanding of the Dermaptera as a whole; the main outline of this new classification is presented in the synoptical table of families on page 31. The author is engaged at the same time upon a general revision and Monograph of the Earwigs of the world, and the system put forward in the following pages is that which he has so far adopted in his manuscript of the larger work. It is unnecessary to add with what pleasure criticism and suggestions will be received. Above all, fresh material is most urgently required, in order that a solution may be obtained for the still remaining problems. X AUTHOR S PREFACE, In order to be cousistent in the use of the word " type " the author lias uniformly followed the principle that one individual specimen, and one only, can be the type of a species. For instance, of Forficula sjostedti, Burr, an African species, the author has examined nearly 500 specimens. Now, it is posssible that in future generations, some entomologist, with great local knowledge, may decide that this number included two distinct forms ; consequently, if every one of these 500 specimens were labelled '' Type ^' and these "types" were scattered through the collections and museums of the world, it would have been impossible to decide which was the true Forficula sjostedti. Again, some of de Bormans' species were based on material partly in the Genoa and partly in the Vienna Museum. Each Museum claims to possess the type. Every specimen, in both collections, in many instances, is labelled " type.'^ In such a case the author has endeavoured to identify the actual individual on which the description was based, or the first specimen named, and for him that has been the type. All the others are syntypes, which have nearly, but not quite, the same value for purposes of identification. The 499 remaining specimens of Forficula sjostedti, for instance, are syntypes. A further term is paratype, which is applied to a specimen which has been identified authoritatively by comparison with a true type. A paratype has therefore a little less value than a syntype, and a syntype than the type, of a species. In the systematic part of this work, an asterisk indicates that the type has been examined by the author, two asterisks denoting a syntype. The material for this work has been derived from the following sources : — I. The results of Leonardo Fea's travels in Burma ; the collections are in the Civic Museum of Genoa ;. they have been reported on by de Bormans (88) and (94). AUTHOR S PREFACE. XI II. A few species taken in Trichinopoli, near Kodai- kanal, enumerated by Bolivar (97), in which paper de Bormans describes some new species. III. Scattered references to Indian localities in general works upon Orthoptera, or on Dermaptera, such as Gue'rin (38), Dohrn (63-67), de Bormans (83) and (00), Diibrony (79), VVestwood (39), and so on. IV. Material in the collections of the Museums of Brussels, Budapest and Paris, reported on by Burr (00), (02), (07^), (08^) and (OS^- V. Material in the Oxford University INluseum ; no account of this collection has yet been published, but the material has been kindly lent to the author by Professor E. B. Poulton, M.A., F.R.S. VI. A paper on the Earwigs of Ceylon, by Burr (01), based chiefly on material collected by Mr. E. Ernest Green, Government Entomologist, at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Peradeniya. VII. Material in the Indian Museum, Calcutta, mostly taken by Dr. Nelson Annandale, and published by Burr (05*), (06') and (07-), including some com- municated by Mr. Maxwell Lefroy, Imperial Entomologist at Pusa, Bengal. VIII. Material specially collected for the purpose of this work, and communicated to the author, by Mr. T. B. Fletcher, formerly of H.M.S. ' Sealark,' quartered at Ceylon, and by Dr. A. Willey, of Colombo. IX. Material from various sources contained in the author's collection and in the collection of Mon- sieur Henri Gadeau de Kerville, of Rouen, who has very obligingly placed his specimens very freely at the author's disposition. But for the efforts of the gentlemen named above, the number of species and localities in the following work would have been reduced by about half. The author takes this opportunity of repeating his thanks for their valuable and enthusiastic help. Xll AUTHOR S PREFACE. It will be observed in the list of species ou p. 23, that a large proportion of types have been examined and it has been attempted to show where all the types are at present preserved. This has been possible in almost all cases where species have been recently described, but the older authors did not specify their types with the accuracy which is now considered necessary. Consequently it has not always been possible to state where the types are in the case of such authors as Serville, Dohrn, &c. In describing a new species the latter author often noted that his material was based on specimens in several collections ; all his original specimens are syntypes, but it is impossible to determine which individual is the type. In such instances, the where- abouts of the syntypes has been noted. It has been assumed that Dohrn's own specimens are still preserved at Stettin, but this is the only important collection of earwigs which has not been placed at the disposal of the author. The author gladly takes this opportunity of recording his gratitude to Dr. Shipley, the most courteous of editors, and especially to Mr. G. A. K. Marshall, whose laborious and careful proof-reading has placed him under a deep sense of obligation. The plates and figures in the text have been drawn by Mr. Edwin AVilson, with the exception of several figures (75, 76, 79 & 90) which are by Mr. Horace Knight. No work upon this group of insects has yet enjoyed such accurate and abundant illustration. MALCOLM BURR. Eastry, Kent. July 6th, 1009. SYTEMATIC LIST OF SPECIES. DEEMAPTEEA.' Family I. Apachyidae. Genus 1. Apachyus, Serv. 1. A. feci', Bonn. 2. A.jxtscoei, Kirby. Genus 2. Dendroiketes, Burr. 1 1. Z>. corticinus, Burr. Family II. Pygidicranidae. Subfamily 1 . Diplaty in ce. Genus 1. Diplatts, Serv. tl. -0. fjladiator, Burr. t2. D. falcatiis, Burr. t3. D. lefroyi, Burr. + 4. D. aufj/ustatus, Burr. 5. D. hormansi, Burr. 6. D. gerstceckeri, Dohrn. 1 7. D. erncsti. Burr. 1 8. D. siva, Burr. 9. D. greeni, Burr. 10. D. rufescens, Kirby. til. D.Jletchen,Bnvr. 12. D. liheratus. Burr. Subfamily 2. P y r/ i die r a n i n cf. ■ Genus 1. Pygidicrana, Serv. 1. P.picfa, Guer. t 2. P. valida, Dohrn. 3. P. 2icillidipennis, Haan. 4. P. en'hnia, Dohrn. 5. P. marmoricrura, Serv. 6. P. siamensis, Dohrn. 1 Species marked with a dagger (t) are not represented in the National Collection. LIST OF SPECIES, Genue 2. Diceana, Burr. 1 . D. halUpyga, Dohrn. Genus 3. Cranopxgia, Burr. 1. C. cwningi, Dohrn. 2. C. 7iietneri, Dohrn. Genus 4. Piceania, Burr. 1. P. angusiata, Dohrn. Genus 5. Pyge, Burr. 1. P. modexta, Borm. 2. P. o^hthahiiica, Dohrn. Family III. Lahiduridae. Subfamily 1 . Palicina;. Genus 1. Palex, Burr. fl. P. sparattoides, Borm. Subfamily 2. Ec hi no so m at in ce. Genus 1. Echinosoma, Serv. 1. E. sumatraman, Haan. t2. E. parvidum,J)ohxn. Subfamily 3. Psal i n ce. Genus 1. Psalis, Serv. 1. P. femora? /s, Dohrn. 2. P. dohrni, Kirby. t3. P. lefroyi, Burr. 1 4. P. castetsi, Borm. Genus 2. Labidurodes, Dubr. 1 1. L. robusttis, Dubr. Genus 3. Gonolabis, Burr. 1 1, G. electa, Burr. Genus 4. Anisolabis, Pieb. 1. A. colossea, Dohrn. 2. A. maritima, Bou. t 3. J.. litdagcB, Burr. 4. A. annidipes, Luc. 5. A. dubronii, Kirby. to. A. gaudens, Burr. LIST OF SPECIES. Genus 5. Bokellia, Burr. 1. B. greeni, Burr. 2, B. stali, Dohrn. t3. B. annandalei, Burr. Subfamily 4. L ah id u r i n cb. Genus 1. Forcipula, Bol. tl. F. decolyi, Borm. 2. F. trispinosa, Dohrn. 3. F. pugnax, Kirby. 4. F. quadrispinosa, Dohrn. 1 5. F. lurida, Bol. Genus 2. Labidura, Leach. f 1. L. 7iepalensis, Burr. 2. L. lividipes, Dufour. 3. L. benc/alensis, Dohrn. 4. L. riparia. Pall. Subfamily 5. P a r i sol ah i n ce. Genus 1. Pseudisolabis, Burr. 1 1. P. hurri, Bor. t 2. P. tenera, Burr. Subfamil}^ 6. Brack y I ah i nee. Genus 1, Nannisolabis, Burr. fl. N. p}iiletas,~Quvv. t2. N. luilleyi, Burr. Genus 2. Metisolabis, Burr. 1 1. M. hifoveolata , Bol. 2. M. caudelli, Burr. Genus 3. Ctexisolabis, Verb. 1 1. Ct. fletcluri. Burr. Family IV. Labiidae. Subfamily 1. Lahiince. Genus 1. Spongiphora, Serv. 1. /Sj»). lutea, Borm. 2. Si), ni/idipennis, Borm. 3. Sp. semijlava, Borm. LIST or SPECIES. Genus 2. Eeotesis, Burr. 1. E. deaj)iens, Kirby. Genus 3. Labia, Leach. 1. L, nigrella, Dubr. 2. L. luzonica, Dohru. 3. L. ciirvicauda, Motseli. 4. L. mucronata, tStal. 5. L. pilicornis, Motsch. 6. L. ]iygidiata, Dubr. 7. L. ridens, Bonn. 8. L. arachidis, Yers. Genus 4. Platylabia, Dohru. 1. P. major, Dohrn. 2. P. gestroi, Dubr. 3. P. thoracica, Dohrn. 4. P. nigriceps, Kirbj. Genus 5. Sphingolabis, Borm. 1. S. fecv, Borm. Faniily V. Forficulidae. Subfamily 1. C h eliso chince. Genus]. Chelisochella, Verb. 1. Ch. siiperha, Dohrn. Genus 2. Exipjfus, Burr. 1. Ex. jjulchri2)ennis, ^ovm. Genus 3. Chelisoches, Scudd. 1. Ch. morio, Fabr. Genus 4. Peoreus, Burr, 1. P. simidans, Stal. 2. P. melanocejjhalus, Dohrn. 3. P. ritsemcf, Borm. Genus .5. Solenosoma, Burr. t 1. «S'. birmanum, Bonn. Genus 6. Adiathetus, Burr. ] . A. slielfordi. Burr. t 2, A. dravidius, Burr. 3. A. cjlaucoptervs, Borm. t 4. A. nigrocastaneKS, Burr. 5. A. tenebrator, Ivirby. Genus 7. Hamaxas, Burr. 1. H. fece, Borm. LIST OF SPF.CIES. Subfamily 2. A nee h n r i n cf. Genus 1. Allodahlia, Verb. 1. A. scabriusculus, Serv. 2. A. macTopygus^ Westw 3. A. coriacea, Bonn. 4. A. ahrimanes, Burr. Genus 2. Homotages, Burr. 1. H. fece, Borm. Genus 'S. Pterygida, Verb. 1. P. circulata, Dobrn. Genus 4. Anechura, Scudd, fl. ^. calciatii, Bor. 2. A. zuJ>ovsk{i, Sem. SubFainily 3. Fo r fi ciil i n /pnus, Chelisoches and the allied genera, this character takes the form of a well-marked furrow or sulcus, which extends for one-third or one-half the length of the tibia. The tarsi ha\e three segments : in Apachyus the first segment is much shorter than the third, but as a rule the first segment is longer than the other two united. The second segment is invariably the shortest ; in Lahia it is very minute ; the greatest length is attained in the Bracliylabina; ; as a rule it is cylindrical, like the other segments (Labidurido', Labiidce, &c.), but in the Chclisoclunm it is produced into a long narrow lobe under the third segment; in the other Forjiculidce it is broadened and dilated into a heart-shaped lobe. The third segment is usually about half as long as the first, and generally cyhndrical ; it is rather short and broad in the Chelisocldnai. The tarsi are depressed. In Diplatys and some other genera there is a indvUlus or pad between the claws of the tarsi, but this shrivels up so much in drying that it it is not of great value as a character. The third segment is armed with a pair of claws. The tarsi are generally strongly pubescent and furnished with long stiff' bristles. The legs are long and slender in the Opisthocosmiinai and in some genera of the Chelisochina;, but as a rule they are relatively short. The hinder pair are always longer than the middle, and the middle than the anterior pair. The abdomen is the most prominent part of an earwig. It is elongate, and in bulk equal to the whole of the rest of tlie insect. In Solenosoma it is almost perfectly cylindrical ; in many Opisilio- cosmiincB it is spindle-shaped, that is, thickest in the middle, but convex, with an almost circular cross-section ; in Diplatys and Pygidicrana it is also convex, but narrowest in the middle (in the male); the commonest form of the abdomen is more or less 8 INTRODUCTIOIf. depressed, with a transverse elliptical cross-section ; the sides- may be parallel (Labidwa, Elaunon), or gently dilated about the middle {Anisolahis and certain species of Forjicula) ; in the Apacliyklce and in Platylabia the body is remarkably depressed, being as flat as cardboard. In tlie female the abdomen almost in- variably tapers somewhat towards the hinder end. There are in all ten segments ; excluding the last, there are nine, but in the female- only seven are visible, as the eighth and the ninth are aborted and reduced to mere specks of chitin which can only be detected upon dissection. In Forcijmla the sides of certain segments are furnished with ridges, keels or long spines ; in certain species of Psalince the sides of the segments are produced posteriorly to a more or less acute angle and are generally striated or furrowed. This struc- ture affords useful specific characters. In Eparchus the sides of the abdomen are studded with a series of knobs or tubercles. In the Lahidtirince the posterior margins of the segments are milled. All these structures are almost or entirely undeveloped in the females. In many genera, as in the Forjiculidie, the Labiidce, and others,, the second and third abdominal segments have at the sides tubercular folds in the integument, which are stink-glands. The segments are closely imbricated into each other ; when the abdomen is distended, the membrane holding the chitinous plates together may be seen with the minute perforation of the tracheal pores. The texture of the chitin varies from smooth to granular. The ventral surface is flat, and generally smoother and paler than the dorsal surface. The last dorsal plate, or sdcrite, is large and ample, and as it presents a great variety of form and of armature it offers valuable discriminative characters ; it is invariably more simple and almost always narrower in the female than in the male. The ■penidtimate ventral sderite is very large, so that the last ventral sderite is almost or entirely hidden ; w hen disclosed by the removal of the penultimate it is shown to be separated into two portions by a median fissure so as to permit the passage of the fseces and the reproductive cells. The outline of the penulti- mate segment is usually slightly different in the two sexes and offers useful generic and specific characters. The pygidium is a chitinous organ existing between the roots of the forceps and the edges of the apical abdominal segments ; it is sometimes hidden, but is as frequently protruded. It assumes a great variety of shapes in both sexes, thus offering very useful specific characters. In the Apadiyidce the last abdominal segment is produced without any apparent suture or joint into a depressed lobe termed the anal process ; as it appears to be a mere extension of the anal segment, it is probably not homologous with the pygidium, which is a distinct organ. The forcejys are the most characteristic organs of earwigs. They consist of a pair of more or less elongate, hard unsegmented INTRODUCTION". chitmoiig processes, rooted into the last abdominal segment, which IS enlarged in order to accommodate the powerful muscles whieli work these organs. The forceps present a great diversity of form : they may be remote or contiguous at the base ; thev may be long and slender, or stout and conical ; they may have a round or a trigonal cross-section ; they are invariably more or less attenuate towards the apex and almost always slightly hooked at the points themselves ; they may be strongly depressed and dilated near the base (Forficuln), or slender and almost cylindrical (Kos77ietor), or conical (Fsalis), very elongate (EudoJirnia), arcuate {Pterygida), asymmetrically bowed (Anisolabis, BoreUia), undulate m a vertical plane {Anechum, AUodaJiIia), armed with diversified teeth {E2X(n'hits)- in both sexes of Apachyus they are curved, siclde-shaped_ hooks. In the female they are almost invariably simpler than in the male, being as a rule straight and unarmed'; but in certain species of the CheUsocJihue the female has forceps as highly organized as those of the male, though very different from them, so that they have sometimes been described as male specimens. As a rule a given type of forceps will be found to characterize a group of species, a genus, or a group of genera, but it is far from rare to find very different forceps in closely allied species. The forceps vary in different degrees within certain limits, aud a very slight actual difference will often alter the superficial appearance of a specimen to a remarkable extent. Care must be taken in drawing deductions from the form of the forceps ; the remarks upon these organs under the heading "Variation" should be studied. The development of the forceps presents phenomena of great interest which throw light upon the phylogeny of the Dermaptera; these are referred to in the article upon the development of Dijilat'/s. The forceps are subject to malformations due to wounds and mutilations, and also to deficient nourishment. It is common to find a male earwig in which one branch of the forceps is formed as in the female ; such cases are frequently recorded as hermaphrodites, but whenever the full complement of nine seg- ments occurs together with one male branch, it is more probable that these are not gynandromorphic specimens, but merely that one branch has been unable to attain full development. Since the specialization (armature &c.) of the forceps is purely a sexual character, it is probable that the simple forceps of the female represent the more primitive form, to which there would be a natural tendency to revert. Cases undoubtedly due to traumatism are shown where an immature specimen has one branch of the forceps pronged : this is evidently caused by an attempt at reproduction of lost parts caused by an injury to the immature forceps. Cases where the forceps have the full complement of teeth but are misshapen or distorted are probably caused by an injury received when the insect has freshly emerged from the nymphal skin and is conse- quently soft and tendei-. 10 INTEODUCTION. Determination of Species. In attempting to determine the species of an earwig, until experience has taught the distinction of the leading groups, the Table of Families on p, 31 should first be consulted. The species of the ApacJiyidie are so distinctive and so few in number, that thej can be recognized almost at a glance. If the specimen is not one of the Apacliyida'., the femora should be examined ; if these are compressed and have one or two little ridges running down them, the specimen is one of the Pyg idler ani dee. The appearance of the two subfamilies of this group are quite distinctive. Each subfamily has its own strong family likeness, but although it is easy to recognize a member of the Dlplatyince or Pyr/idicranince at a glance, it is usually a matter of some difficulty to determine the species. If the femora are smooth, the tarsi should be examined; if the small second segment has any lobe or dilation, the specimen is one of the Forficulidce, and if not, it must be referred to the Labidurimc or to the Lahiida;. In the fox'mer family, the dorsal surface of the last segment is folded downward between the base of the forceps and so presents a vertical face, which sometimes is separated from the dorsal horizontal face by an angle, but the passage is often gradual. In the Lahiidiv, this does not occur, there being an opening between the roots of the forceps and the dorsal and ventral plates of the end of the abdomen, and in this space there may often be seen the chitinous organ of diversified shape termed the i^ygldium. It is worth while giving an imaginary example of these synoptical tables. The examination of our undetermined earwig perhaps shows a small lobe on the second segment of the tarsi ; we accordingly turn to the Table of the Subfamilies of the Forjtculido} on p. 129. We again examine the second tarsal segment and observe that it is broadened out on each side, thus assuming a heart-shaped out- line ; this precludes the ChelisocMno'. Next, turning the speci- men over and examining the sternal plates, we find that these are not decidedly broader than they are long, which precludes the Anechuriiue. The body is rather depressed — somewhat widened about the middle ; a cross-section would not be circular, but would show a depressed transverse ellipse. Therefore it must be referable to the Forficulince, and we turn to the Table of Genera on p. 162. The shape of the forceps, which are very broad and flat near the base, but become suddenly elongate, arcuate and slender, show that it is a Forficula, and we turn to the Table of Species on p. 165 "We see that the pronotum is not very decidedly transverse, so this precludes the first four species. Neither is it crescent-shaped, and this precludes the next two. As the dilation of the forceps is not confined to the extreme base, but extends about a quarter or a third of the length of these organs, it cannot be F. ambigna. The elytra and wings are not spotted, so it cannot be F. lucasi. INTKODrCTION. 11 The pronotum is not much longer than broad, and does not extend very far over the base of the elytra, so it cannot be F. celeris. The sides of the abdomen are not parallel, thus excluding F. interrogans, but are decidedly widened about the middle. Our specimen is therefore Forflcula 2i^(t.^^icoUis, Kirby, and we verify this by a careful comparison of the detailed description, remarks and figures on p. 174. Bevelojoment. The post-embryonic development of Dlplatys has been worked out by Green for the two Singhalese species, D. gerstcecheri, Dohrn, and I), r/reeni, Burr. The young larva has a general resemblance to the imago, but there are of course no signs of any organs of flight in the earlier stages. The second tarsal segment is fused with the first, there is no pulvillus between the claws, and the lateral abdominal glandular folds are not developed until later. But the most remarkable characteristic of the larva lies in the fact that instead of forceps, the apex of the abdomen is furnished with long segmented cerci or filaments. The number of segments in these cerci varies in the different species, and also in different indi- viduals of the same species, this being probably due to their fragihty. The following series of measurements of B. gerstcecleri is given by Green : — No. Length of hody. Length oj cerci. No. of segments in cerci. 1 .. . . 2-5 mm. 2 "5 mm. 14 o 3 .. .. 3 .. 4-5 6 10 27 with incomplete divisions where fresh joints are forming. 43 4 .. .. 6-5 incomplete (apparently injured) 5 .. .. 7-75 13-5 45 6 .. .. 9 1 1 This table brings out the remarkable development of the cerci. In the penultimate instar these are abruptly curtailed to a single segment, which retains, however, its original character, and the extremities look as though they were bitten off. The two cerci are not necessarily curtailed simultaneously. The future forceps can be seen by transmitted light, showing through the sheath thus formed by this basal segment, which is always much longer than 12 INTRODUCTION'. any of the other segments. In D. greeni, Burr, the cerci are shorter, the increase in the number of segments is more gradual, and the maximum number attained appears to be 18 or 20. Green was unable to count the exact number of ecdyses, but observed four successive moults, the last revealing the perfect insect. Each instar occupies about 10 days. In ecdysis, the skin splits along the median dorsal line of the thorax and is shed completely, even including the covering of the delicate caudal appendages. The penultimate instar, or nymph, may be recognized by the truncated cerci and also by the appearance of the radiating pattern on the metathorax, showing in miniature the future wing of the imago. The lateral glandular folds of the abdomen appear when the larva is about half grown. A curious ])oint was also noticed by Green. In the penultimate stage the anterior femora were broad and armed on the inner edge with a row of spines, which gave them a distinctly raptorial appearance : but he never saw them used for any purpose other than locomotion. The segmented caudal cerci have been recorded, but not described, in some unknown African species {vide Proc. Ent. Soc. Washington, iv, nr. 2, p. 53, 1898). Terry (05) has described the egg and post-embryonic develop- ment of CheJisoclies morio. There appear to be four larval instars before the adult imago. Terry's observations on the manner of increase of the antennal segments ai-e very interesting. It appears that the larva has at first only 8 segments ; at the first ecdysis the third segment is divided into four additional segments ; at the second ecdysis, the third segment gives rise to four more; at the third, to three more ; at the fourth, to one more, so that the normal total of 20 is thus attained. Terry failed to discover any trace of segmentation in the forceps of the embryo in ovo : this is interesting when compared with Green's observations on Diplatys. Copulation. De Geer's description of the family life of the common English earwig is generally known. According to this observer, the act of copulation is effected by the male approaching the female backwards, tapping her with his forceps, and then effecting the connection tail to tail, the pair being thus arranged in a straight line. Gadeau de Kerville has noticed and described the same thing, and insists that, though the male seems to try to catch hold of the female with his forceps, this organ does not appear to be of any use either before or during the act. The male is obliged to twist the apex of his abdomen so that the ventral plates face upwards in contact with the ventral plates of the female, and this torsion sometimes goes so far as to involve the IWTEODUCTIOIT. 13 "head. The connection appears to last several hours, as observed in captivity. In another species, F. lesnei, Finot, not uncommon in West Central Europe, Lesne observed a pair in coitu while hanging from the under surface of the cork of a tube : in this case, the ventral surfaces of the two individuals were juxtaposed. In Chelklura aptera, Charp., a European Alpine species, de Bormans observed that the male applied the underside of his forceps to the ventral surface of the female. This ])osition involves the torsion of the abdomen of the male as Gadeau de Kerville observed. Xambeu noted the same thing in an allied species, Ch. 2^yi'enaica, Gene. Bennett observed the same fact in Anisolahis maritima in New York, and Gadeau de Kerville noticed it in Anisolahis mauritanica, Luc. The copulation of Labidura riparia, Pallas, as observed by Sopp, is effected in the same way. The copulation of Dlplatjis r/reeni is described as follows by Green : — " On Oct. 27, 1897, a pair of this new species, reared up in captivity, were found in coitu. The abdomen of tlie male was twisted round and the extremity was closely applied to the under surface of the pygidium [? penultimate ventral plate] of the female." Ouijposition, In Ceylon, Green observed Diplatys greeni in coitu on Oct. 27th : the first eggs were deposited on Nov. 4th, that is only a weelv later, and other eggs were added at intervals, during the following week, until a total of twenty-five had been laid. They were scattered singly over the exposed surface of the moss-covered bark, which had been provided as a shelter for the insect, adhering slightly to their support. Towards the end of the egg-laying period, a few were deposited in irregular clusters and unattached to the moss. In Sweden, de Geer found the newly hatched larvae at the beginning of June, and the writer has found them in the south of England in April. De Geer also found a female (F. auricularia) with her eggs under stones in April. Tascheuberg found the ova in Europe on February 19th after an exceptionally mild winter, and the larvae emerged on March 7th. Camerano found the ova in Southern Europe as early as January 24fch, and the larvae emerged on 30th Januaiy- With regard to the period between fertilization and oviposition, the same author records a female, which he had taken during the winter, laying eggs on 10th March ; and in temperate latitudes it is probable that this period is generally a good deal longer than in warm countries. Riihl records the emergence of young larvae from ova which had been 26 days in his possession. With regard to Ghelidura pijrc^iaicn, Gene, in the Pyrenees, Xambeu records that copulation occurs in April or May, 14 INTEODUOTIOJJ". according to the altitude (this species ranges from 4000 to 8000 ft.). The larvse hatch out about three weeks after oviposition, in mild weather. In New York, Bennett observed that Anisolabis maritima generally lays its eggs in the warm days of July and August, and a few after the middle of September. Ova. The ova are elliptical in shape. Those of Forficula auricularia are white, smooth and oval (de Geer). They are described as yellowish by Taschenberg and Eiihl ; Camerauo found them regularly piled in little heaps. The eggs of CheUdnra pyrenaica are described by Xambeu as being 1"3 mm. long and 1 mm. in diameter, ovoid in shape, yellowish, smooth and shining, imper- ceptibly punctuated, with rounded poles and a resisting shell. The eggs of Anisolabis maritima are described by Xambeu as ellip- soid, white, and surrounded by a shiuing translucent shell ; they are about 2 mm. long. A few days after oviposition the embryo is visible inside the egg-shell, in the form of a crescent, and the side of the egg bulges somewhat. At the end of 17 days the larva emerges, but this period varies with the condition of warmth and moisture. The egg of Diplati/s greeni is regularly elliptical, pale, pinkish yellow, and shining ; 0-8 mm. long and 0"5 mm. broad. Those of Anisolabis mauritanica, Luc, are of a faint yellowish white, sub- spherical, from 1 to 1*2 mm. long ; the shell is smooth, thin and transparent. Heymons describes the ova of Anisolabis littoi'ea, White, as 3 mm. long. The number of eggs laid varies : — No. of eggs. 25 90 Species. Bx-platys greeni (captivity) .... Anisolahis maritima (free) (captivity) . . (One female laid four times in a summer.) Anecliura bipunctata (captivity) . . 18-25 CJielidiira pyrenaica (free) 40-45 Forjlcula auricularia (free) .... 12-22 Observer. G-reen. Bennett. Euhl. Xambeu. Eiihl. Habits. Earwigs may be found almost everywhere out of doors. Generally they shun daylight, and many species may be found INTRODUCTION. 15' under stones, crawling in shallow galleries or chinks. Green noticed a curious habit in Diplatys ; on lifting a stone, this creature is usually found back downwards, clinging to the stone itself. Other earwigs are generally found resting on the ground beneath the stone. Apterous, alpine forms are generally found under stones, or under dead leaves, bark of trees or other rubbish. They occur up to an elevation of 8000 ft. in the Alps. In the Himalayas, ear\vigs are common up to a considerable elevation, but information as to the limits of their vertical distribution is lacking. Although nocturnal in habits, earwigs, like moths, are attracted to light, and Mr. Green has taken a good number of species in his bungalow in this manner. No earwigs are truly aquatic, but species of Forci^mla are known to frequent moist places. Dr. Annandale found F. decoJyi at Kurseoug, under stones at the edges of mountain streams, prac- tically in the water. When forced towards the stream, they swam rapidly on the surface, but they did not enter the water of their own accord. Dr. Annandale, referring to Lahidura rij^ciria, Pall., yar. inermis, Br., writes as follows': — " By far the commonest species in Calcutta. They lie in crevices such as those in the bark of trees, and when a small cock- roach or other suitable insect passes them, the abdomen is rapidly shot out sideways and the forceps seize the insect by means of a sudden twist. The prey is transferred to the mouth, sometimes being held also by the forceps ; but should the earwig be disturbed, it runs away carrying the prey in the latter. If one individual comes upon another which is feeding, the former often attempts to steal the food. The rightful owner then threatens the other by directing its forceps towards the aggressor over its back ; but I have never seen one earwig nip another, nor have I been able to induce one to nip my finger." Of an allied species, L. lividipes, Dr. Annandale writes the following note ^ : — " These little earwigs frequently come to light singly or in small numbers during the hot \Aeather and the rains, and speci- mens can generally be taken round the arc lamps in the public gardens in Calcutta at this time of the year, the two forms occurring together. Large numbers were noted round an oil lamp in the Museum compound on the evening of June IGth, after a wet and stormy day, the first of the monsoon. Several persons have told me that they saw enormous numbers of small earwigs round their lamps on the same evening in dilierent parts of Calcutta. On the pi*eceding and following evenings only a few individuals were seen." ' Burr, (06) p. 388. 2 Annandale, (06) p. 391. 16 INTBODIJCTION. " I have often watched earwigs of this species expanding and folding away their wings. The wings are generally expanded by a I'apid movement of the anterior part of the body, suggesting a shrug of the shoulders ; but sometimes a hitch occurs, and this movement is insutficient to stretch out both wings properly. The abdomen is then bent upwards and forwards, and the forceps are used to unfold the delicate membrane. They do not seize this membrane, however, but are closed together during the operation and are used as a lever or smoothing organ. In a similar manner they are often employed to push the wing into its place beneath the elytra, although movements of the thorax play an important part in this process also." Terry never saw C'helisocJies morio use its forceps in this manner. He writes (05) : — " The adults will readily take to flight, the unfolding of the wings being a very rapid process and quite independent of the forceps, the writer never having seen them used either to assist in the folding or unfolding process." The flattened forms, as Apachyus, probably live under bark. An African species of this genus was observed by Dr. Creightou Wellman, at Benguella, to live under the bark of dead trees, and to come out of wood when placed on the fire. In Burma, Fea found A.fece under bark, as well as various species of Chelisoches, and some species of Labia. The flattened genera Sparatia (which is not yet known to occur in India) and Platylahia . probably resemble Apachijus in their habits. Fea found Metisolabis caudelli and various species of Opistliocosmiince under dried leaves, vege- table rubbish, and over-ripe fruit. Pygidicrana picta is found commonly among dead leaves at the base of trees near Calcutta (Annandale), and P. cuminr/i and P. nietneri are found in Ceylon, under stones, loose bark, etc., and often come into buildings (Green). Labia mucronata was found by Green in decaying pods of cocoa and of Poincaiiia, and in the crevices of the bark of cocoa trees. Forficula greeni is often taken in bungalows in Ceylon, and one was found by Green in an empty gall on Antidesma, one of the EiiplwrbiacecB. Cordax ceyloaiciis is attracted to light (Green), and also Proreiis simuluns (Annandale). In Europe earwigs do not, as a rule, use their wings readily, except Labia minor, but in the tropics crowds of them come flying to light (de Bormans). The common European Forficula auricularia, Linn., has been recorded by Collinge (08) to fly into houses through the windows in England in considerable numbers on dark sultry evenings in June and July between 9.30 and 10.30 p.m. ; in three consecutive evenings, as many as 26 specimens flew in ; it is noteworthy that they avoided the gas, and also that they were all males. The same author notes two occasions on which they were seen to fly in broad daylight. Theobald (96) has noticed that in Kent they devour the young foliage of hops and sometimes do considerable damage ; he writes : INTKODUCTION. 17 " It seems the adults take readily to their wing on certain nights,, especially when the moon is bright. Numbers later in the year used to fly into my house of a night, attracted by the lights." The tubercular folds in the integument at the sides of the abdo- men appear to be stink-glands, but little evidence is forthcoming on this point. Green found that Elaunon hipartitus, Kirby, when handled, gave off a pungent odour, like that of the Bombardier- Beetle. The forceps, which assume such a variety of remarkable shapes, especially in the male, are useful weapons of offence and defence. We have seen (p. 15) how Lahidura riparia uses them to seize its prey. Of Diplatijs, Green writes: — "When food is? offered to an adult Dyscritma [^Diplatys] it usually goes through a curious performance to test its suitability. It takes up its position to one side of and slightly in advance of the object ; then bending its abdomen round to one side, it gives it a sharp nip with its forceps and retires quickly to note results. If the proffered object does not resent this treatment, it is then considered safe and fit for food : but if the victim makes any movement, Di/scritina immediately retires beneath its shelter." A number of interesting notes on the function of the forceps of earwigs have been collected by Gadeau de Kerville (05), who shows that they are used as a weapon of offence and defence, but never during the act of copulation. Also, the insects do, occasionally, at all events, use them as a help to fold and unfold their delicate wings and to lift their elytra. Even Forjicula auricularia was observed to do this by Paul Noel, and the same thing has been observed in an unnamed species by Morris. With reference to their use as a weapon, the author was startled by a nip of a female Lahidura riparia, which made him drop the creature, and though the forceps did not pierce the tough skin of the human thumb, it would have been a formidable adventure to an insect of its own size. Gadeau de Kerville was nipped by F. auri- cidaria so strongly that blood was drawn, and Commander- J. J. Walker had the same experience in New South Wales, from the largest known earwig, Anisolabis colossea. Baer (04) has recorded that tlie relatively weak A'ptenjr/ida linearis, Esch., in the Argentine Eepublic, is capable of raising a local inflammation by its nip, though the irritation was perhaps caused by septic matter present on the forceps, for no traces of poison glands are known. The author introduced a large bluebottle into a small glass-topped box with a male Lahidura riparia. The earwig by a lightning-like movement, instantly transfixed the fly on one limb of its forceps, and carried it about thus spiked for several hours before devouring it. Food. Earwigs are probably omnivorous, though chiefly carnivorous. Green was unable to determine the natural food of Biplatys, but c 18 INTRODUCTION. he is probably correct in supposing that it consists of soft bodied insects. In captivity, his larvae and imagines fed sparingly on the dead bodies of small spiders and flies and other minute insects, showing a preference, however, for certain species. They did not relish Lepidoptera or mosquitos, though they would devour the bodies of the latter if hungry. Bread, raw meat, petals of flowers, fruit, and minute fungi were offered and refused. The writer has fed Labidura riparia on bluebottles ; these they suck dry and leave the empty skin. Xambeu tells us that Chelidura pyrenaica is a veritable glutton. Tender vegetables, fruit, worms, larvae, all are greedily eaten ; hut they have pronounced carni\orous tastes. Many species are found in swarms on stinging nettles, but it is probable that they are less attracted by the nettles themselves than by the numbers of minute insects to which these plants offer a home. Terry records of ChelisocJies morio, Fabr., in the Sandwich Islands, that its habit of eating the leaf-hoppers has been ob- served by several people. Young hoppers are seized and devoured without the aid of the forceps, but these organs frequently assist inholding an adult hopper whilst it is eaten at leisure. An ex- amination of numerous crops invariably revealed only insect remains, often entirely leaf-hopper. Those bred in captivity showed during all iustars a marked preference for insect diet. Maternal Cava. The oft-quoted observations of de Gear on the solicitude of the mother earwig for her ova and young larvae are worthy of reproduction : — " At the commencement of the month of June, (says he) I found under a stone a female earwig accompanied by several small insects which I easily recognized as its young. They grouped round the mother and did not leave her, and even placed themselves under her stomach like little chicks under the hen. The insects of this genus have then, in a kind of manner, care for their young, even after their birth : and they seem to wish to protect them by ^remaining near them. " The young resemble their mother in figure, except in one or two of their parts I placed them in a sand-box where I had put a little fresh earth. They did not enter the earth, and it was curious to see how they ran under the stomach and between the legs of the mother, who remained very quiet and allowed them to do it : she seemed to cover them like a hen does her little chicks, and they remained often in this position for hours " Another time, at the commencement of April 1759, I found some female earwigs under some stones, together with a pile of eggs on wliich the mother was seated and of which she took the greatest care imaginable without ever moving a step away, and this M. Frisch has already observed before me. I took it INTRODUCTION. 1 9 •with its eggs and placed it in a sand-box half filled with fresh €arth, in such a fashion that the eggs were scattered here and there : but soon the mother took the eggs one after the other between her jaws and transported them. After several days I noticed she had got them all together in a like place on the surface of the earth which she found in a sand-box, and there she re- mained constantly seated on them in such a manner that she seemed to cover them." This interesting observation has been confirmed by a number of writers, including Kirby and Spence, Taschenberg, Camerano, and Fritz itiihl. Lesne found a mother sitting on her eggs near Las Palmas (Grand Canary), and Xambeu's remarks on the same habit in Chelklura pyrenaica are worth quoting^: — "As soon as the female is fertilized, she digs at the end of the gallery a small excavation in which she places her eggs one by one to the number of 40 or 45, in such a way as to make a small bundle of them, upon which she soon places herself in much the same way as a hen sits on her eggs. It is with a solicitude without equal — an unexampled attachment — that she devotes herself to this maternal task (a rare case in the entomological world), and this continues up to the time of hatching. If during the course of sitting, anything disturbs or exposes her eggs — in raising the stone which shelters them — she takes them with lier mandibles and conceals them in the soil at tlie bottom of her gallery. " During the first days which follow the hatching, the young Caelidura are watched by their mother and led, like a hen leads her chicks, towards the places where they will find the means of satisfying their great appetites. Tender vegetables, fruits, worms, larvae, in fact anything is good enough for these gluttons who are insatiable. As soon as their bodies are fortified, and their in- tegument has acquired a certain stability, the mother ceases her care and abandons them to themselves. They tlien disperse, each taking a different direction, and this scattering has become very necessary, as, owing to their very pronounced carnivorous tastes, they would injure and devour one another, which it is necessary to avoid for the preservation of the species." Green's ova of Dlplatys greeni were watched by the parent who remained constantly near her eggs, visiting each in turn, and mouthing them in a peculiar manner, as if to keep them clean. Geofjraj^ >h ical D istr ih ution. Although the state of our knowledge of the Dermapterous fauna of India is still meagre, some generalization may be permitted. As would be expected, we find in the Himalayas marked Palae- arctic aflSnities : for instance, the essentially Eurasian genus Anechura is represented by two species, both occurring in Kashmir ; one of these, A. calciatii, is probably peculiar ; the other, ' (1903) p. 143. c2 20 INTRODUCTION. A. zuhovsl-ii, is a local form of the common European Alpine- A. hipxmctata, which passes iuto A. asiatica in the mountains of Central Asia. Allied to Aneclmra is Allodalilia which has its headquarters in the mountains of Northern India, whence it has spread through Burma into the Malayan Archipelago ; thus of the four known species, A. ahrimanes is prohably confined to the Eastern Himalayas, A. viacrojjijfja and A. coriacea extend to the uplands of Northern Burma, and A. scah-iuscula has reached Java. Of the eleven known Indian species of Forjicxda, eight are Himalayan ; as this genus is eminently Palsearctic, it is probably from Northern India that it has gained a precarious footing in the remoter parts of the Oriental Eegion. The occurrence of two species of Pseudisolabis in the mountains of the north-west of India is carious, as this genus was hitherto only known from a single species in New Zealand. It may be that it is a very ancient geiuis. The hills of Northern India seem to be the headquarters of some other genera, which have thence extended their distribution into the heart of the Oriental Eegion. Thus Kosmetor is re- presented by three species, the other two being Malayan ; the same may be said of TimomeiiKs, which has however, an outlying representative in the extreme" north-east of the Palsearctic Eegion. The distribution of the genus Forci])ida is remarkable, as it is a veil-marked group ; two species are known in the Neotropical Eegion, and two in the Ethiopian, but eight are purely Oriental, of which five are only found in India. One of these, F. Iwida, is a South Indian form, but the other four are characteristic of Northern India and Northern Burma ; perhaps this district is the headquarters of the group, for the non-Indian Oriental forms are rare, and less highly specialized. Another M'idely-distributed genus well represented in India is DipJatys ;. this is certainly a primitive and ancient group, with representatives in all tropical regions except Austraha, so far as is known. Of the two dozen described species, no less than twelve occur in India and are probably peculiar. Well-marked genera which are ronfined to India, so far as we know, are Lijximra, Eudohmiay and the curious Solenosoma, all being specialized monotypic genera only known from North India and Burma. Lipodes, of which a unique defective specimen from Dikraugs is in the Calcutta Museum, is probably also peculiar. The BrachyJahince are an apterous group m ith some distinctly archaic features recalling the Tertiary earwigs of Florissant. Probably they are the survivors of an ancient group, which would account at once for their comparative scarcity and wide distribution in all tropical regions. Of the seven known genera, three are re- presented in India : Nannisolahis has two known species, both peculiar ; Metisolahis has four, of which two are Indian and two Ethiopian ; and Ctenisolabishas three, one Indian, one Ethiopian, and one Neotropical. No one species of Brachylahince occurs in any two regions. INTRODUCTION. 21 In Southern India and Ceylon we find several peculiar genera, «uch as Cranopy?/scr/